High Sierra Investment

vietnam fund

Japan’s appetite for spending in emerging markets has caught up with Vietnam investment.

Final month, when Daiwa Securities launched an expense trust which allocates 40 percent of its funds to Vietnamese stocks, need was so powerful how the securities group came near sufficient to reaching its Y27bn ($290m) target and needed to quit accepting on the internet orders in just two days.

The attractions of Vietnam to Japanese investors are obvious. In contrast to Japan, exactly where the economic climate & investments stagnant and also the population is declining, Vietnam is really a young nation attracting growing foreign expense.

Daiwa describes the nation as “the Japan of South-east Asia” in its marketing and advertising papers.

Japanese investors’ curiosity in Vietnam is yet an additional sign that their adore of emerging markets continues unabated.

Even back in December, when there had been nevertheless concerns concerning the dangers of the double dip within the worldwide economic climate, a survey by HSBC discovered that mass affluent Japanese investors favoured emerging markets as an expense destination.

The survey discovered that near to 60 percent of mass affluent Japanese investors had been worried how the worldwide economic climate could buckle once again but that didn’t quit 47 percent of respondents from expressing curiosity in spending overseas, especially in emerging markets, based on HSBC.

“Strong curiosity was also shown towards Vietnam along with other south-eastern Asian nations that are at an early stage of economic improvement and are anticipated to develop strongly more than the mid-to-long phrase,” the bank reported.

Spending in Vietnam isn’t simple, nevertheless.

Provided how the Vietnamese stock marketplace had a marketplace capitalisation of Y2,500bn in the end of March, and you will find only 219 stocks listed, its capability to accept expense isn’t big, Daiwa notes.

The fund is spending 40 percent from the total, or Y10.8bn, within the Vietnamese stock marketplace. But that is equivalent to some entire day’s worth of trading – in March the typical was Y10.5bn, based on Daiwa.

We are all well aware of the impact that the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is having on the environment and its potential to cause even more damage, especially since it comes on the heels of Earth Day 2010. Hundreds of thousands of fish, birds, and other aquatic lives will be lost, the soil will be spoiled and unable to support vital plant growth and the waters will be toxic for both for many years to come.

But, many are also growing concerned about the economic impact that such a disaster poses during an already tough economic climate. Countless entrepreneurs have been interviewed by the likes of CNN, Fox News and other media outlets, telling their stories of lost revenues, lost inventories, and the potential for lost businesses, many of which are finally beginning to see the light in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

Not only does this disaster have the potential to crush the surf side economies of Texas, Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi, but also to reach into the pockets of each and every one of us. Plans for domestic offshore drilling in Alaska, who was next in line for federal funding, will now be halted, further solidifying our dependence on foreign oil imports. Not only that, but the price of Alaskan crude managed to jump from $2.70 per barrel to $83.97. Now, what do you think this will do to the average price of gas where you live, especially in the face of higher summer demand? And what about food prices, heating oil, and so forth? Feels like déjà vu all over again.

At last count, the estimated cost of cleanup is going to cost somewhere in the neighborhood of several billion dollars. Of course, everyone’s looking to BP to cover the cost, but what happens if they can’t or won’t? Does that mean that we simply leave the oil where it is? Not even close. The federal government will foot the bill, and as we’ve all seen during the financial bailout, it’s not the government that foots the bill…it’s us. Sadly, there is no loan product that we can issue that will allow Mother Nature to repay the cost of cleanup, with interest. This one’s solely on our shoulders. Of course, this will mean higher taxes, more aggressive tax collecting policies and tons of grief from the federal government to “pay our fair share”.

I am beginning to wonder where the oversight was on this one. As a card carrying member of the Murphy’s Law club, I completely understand that no matter what precautions we take in life, sometimes stuff just happens. Things are not always under our control and we are reminded of this year after year. But, in hind sight (which is always 20/20, by the way) whose decision was it to NOT use that little $500,000 thingy that maybe could’ve stopped this whole thing before it ever happened? Somewhere, someone is still slapping himself in the forehead with his palm and shaking his head miserably, probably somewhere in the unemployment office, wondering why he didn’t consider spending just a little bit more and ensuring the safety of his rig. He was probably already way over budget (which is a no-no in this day and age) no matter what shape the economy is in, and so he had to figure out how to cut costs.

When are we going to learn that faster and cheaper do not always result in better? When is it going to become unacceptable to sacrifice safety and responsibility for a higher profit margin? As much as we’d like to blame BP, we have all played a little part in this disaster, by allowing companies to gamble the safety of their workers, the environment and even the public in exchange for larger profits. Think this is an isolated incident? Think again. Remember the West Virginia mining disaster earlier in April 2010?

The problem is that we as a society has allowed this to happen. We turn the other cheek, choosing to work, patronize, and even elect supporters of this type of behavior into office time and time again and are then outraged when things like this happen. The truth is that we have the power to prevent these types of accidents from happening. We need to take a new approach and force companies to change the way they do business by placing safety and personal responsibility first.

Read on »

All your life, you’ve probably heard how important it is to secure your retirement early. You’ve put it off, made excuses, and now you’re closer to retirement than you are away from it. Your first instinct might be to panic or resign yourself to working until you drop dead, but it doesn’t have to be that way.

With careful planning and smart strategies, you can make retirement work even when you’re way behind and close to cashing in. You don’t have to depend on Social Security alone. Here are some of the ways you can get back on track.

Know what you need. Sit down and make a plan for the expenses you will need to cover in your retirement. Think about what you already have in retirement accounts, and what you can expect to receive from Social Security. A financial planner or retirement software can be extremely helpful in this situation to ensure that nothing is overlooked. With a clear view of what’s needed, you will be better prepared to tackle the mounting task of retirement.

Cut back. The simplest way to get on track for retirement is to save as much as you can, as often as you can. Save this year’s vacation for your retirement years. Forgo frequent restaurant nights out for healthy cooked meals at home.
Plan on retiring a bit later. For some, 70 is the new magic number. By putting off retirement by a few years, you can take advantage of health benefits longer, earn more money to contribute, and give your nest egg a bit longer to grow before you tap in. Additionally, your retirement will be shorter, so you will not need as much in your fund.

Consider part time employment. Setting up part time employment helps you in two ways. First, if you start a part time job while you’re still working full time, you can funnel part time funds directly into your retirement. Second, you will already be set up in a job you’re comfortable with if you decide later that you’re ready to go on semi-retirement and work part time.

Get selfish. You may have kids going off to college and elderly parents who need support. You don’t have to completely forget about your desire to help them, but remember that you will also be in a precarious position when it’s time for you to retire. College students can get loans, and you may be able to find benefits programs for your parents. Additionally, say no to spendthrift friends and family in need of loans-that money is better taken care of in your retirement account.

By getting on track for your retirement as soon as you can, you can stop the panic and anxiety of not knowing what the future holds for you. Take these steps and more to get a better handle on the finances of your twilight years.

Read on »

home

By definition, an investment is “the act of laying out money or capital in an enterprise or asset with the expectation of profit.” So by definition, is a home really an investment? With mortgage rates at a historical low and depressed home prices, it really depends on who you ask.

The self-made, multi-millionaire real estate investor who bought in when homes were cheap would answer with an emphatic yes. But times are different now, and many of those same home flippers and amateur investors are declaring bankruptcy while banks are seizing their assets.

In the wake of one of the worst economic catastrophes ever (and caused by overzealous home purchases), people are finally starting to realize that the era of easy money is gone when it comes to housing. While most people still believe a home is a great investment, there are several good reasons why you should reconsider thinking like most people.

1. Homes Don’t Always Appreciate.

Take a look at the major decline that the housing market has suffered from lately. Things are not looking good for millions of homeowners who are now late on their mortgage payments or are already in foreclosure. Try telling them that housing is a good investment.

This recent development only shows how volatile housing can be. Unlike stocks or smaller investments, you cannot sell a home quickly if you needed to.

2. Investment Properties Often Lose Money.

It sounds great to own a second home or investment property. You get the title of landlord, get to brag to people that you own property, and you’re finally in charge.

Guess again.

Many people have no clue how difficult managing a property can be, especially in states that often favor tenants over landlords. You could have periods of vacancy, vandalism from horrible tenants and a host of other regulation issues on your hands.

On top of that, maintenance fees and property taxes can cripple you. Have you checked on the price of a new roof or a set of new pipes? It’s definitely not the dream many expect.

By the time investment property owners are ready to call it quits, they’ve either lost money or broke even after years of stress.

3. Returns are Minimal.

Using data from the Case Shiller Index of 10 major cities, The Wall Street Journal ran an article showing that home prices produced a real return of just 1.15 percent a year over inflation.

If you bought a home in one of the 10 major cities in 1994, almost the lowest historical trough for home prices, you would still only come out 2.5 percent ahead of inflation. Compared to stocks and inflation proof government bonds, that’s a pretty low return. Factor in other things like maintenance and property taxes and you could have actually lost money.

So the next time you’re at a party and someone brings up the abundance of opportunity being presented by the weak housing market, you’ll be able to provide them with some facts.

You can definitely come out ahead in housing if you’re buying for the long term (about 10 years), but then, isn’t that more of a home than an investment?

Read on »